![]() They were apparently at the required resolution, but in full Adobe Acrobat were showing incorrectly.Īffinity, in whatever form, has a way to go yet. The only issue I had was that the resolution of grouped images when output to PDF were showing as 150DPI, despite being 300+. I have been a longterm user of PagePlus, and still find it does things I had not realized were available. I have just published my latest 350-page book using Serif PagePlus, which was put out to pasture far earlier than it should have been, and frankly knocks spots off the young pretender. It is not significantly different from a glorified word processor currently, except for the cross-program functionality which seems to be the be-all and end-all of Affinity - which is of course doubtless the reason for the name. The official response seems to have failed to grasp the simple logic that if the program is sold as a professional DTP program, it is reasonable for buyers (especially long-standing Serifomanes) to expect it to be capable of performing as a professional DTP program. ![]() It does seem to me to be moving forward - not at all. I have watched with interest the conversation. Who could have imagined such blindness on your part? The management of spaces relating to punctuation (how can you suffice it to believe that only the English typography exists and in addition only to the one you have chosen exists),Ī translation made by real professionals and not this horror,īecause of your delay, I was forced, and many other buyers like me, to delay and then finally transfer projects with your software to another less exciting, Adobe, but more respectful of its clients. The opening of the necessary information to companies manufacturing extensions, The correct conversion of an Affinity file into an Adobe File which is THE software used by all printers, The management of all kinds of fonts delivered free of charge by Microsoft and Apple, The management of footnotes and similary, It is inadmissible that we still can't find : Printing is essentially books and posters (and similar). You seem to have forgotten that DTP software is intended for the printing industry. Nevertheless, it still shamefully lacks the indispensable and necessary functionalities for such a product. Publisher is very promising and has seen many new features appear since its public launch. In which parallel world do you live? These words are very similar to the denial of an obese president of a distant banana republic close to Canada who claims for months, even before the elections, to have been re-elected despite the difference of 6 million voters for his opponent and 306 electors against 232. Publisher is being used in it's present form by many users, though perhaps not for your use case. I used to regularly get calls from Nottingham asking me if I wanted something they were promoting, but that has also disappeared. It is not clear to me who Serif is targetting with this software, but i suspect they are more interested in a slice of the apple pie than in those who have remained loyal for decades. Even comics can be done simpler with other programs. If you are producing comics, or novels, or even simple picture books, fine, but not for 'academic' works. I am trying to give APub a chance, so I am experimenting with simple publications, but so far the endnote/footnote thing is a serious obstacle for my sort of work. I may have succeeded with some of it in Apub, but I am not confident and I certainly could not have done the footnotes and made them move with text or pagination changes. Just about to publish another book with something like 360 pages including hundreds of images and a good number of footnotes. Either that, or they have lost the people who understood PP9 and the pther Serif products. I suspect that there may be a face-saving problem as a result. The issue really is that Serif jumped the gun by dropping PagePlus too soon. There used to (and still is not, in my view) an affordable program to touch PagePlus9. My own tendency is to use the program which works, which is sometimes an Affinity version (APhot is good, for example, for lighting but often it is not the best for my work - Photoshop Elements or Corel Paintshop Pro is). I have been trying to create stuff in APub, but on the whole it does not seem to be as functional as PP9 unless you are seriously into the other Affinity stuff. While there are some decent things in APub it is still a long way from the complex techniques of PagePlus9 - and even earlier PagePlus versions. I also am not a professional designer, although I publish stuff professionally. Sadly, there is no sign of a footnotes (or endnotes) system arriving unless it is in the new version due to come - but it does not seem to be featured in the Beta version mentioned above.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |